Fashion fax pas: 2024

When I was in TV, it mattered what I wore. Today, not so much.

It might surprise those who know me that I didn’t always spend my days in shorts and T-shirts. (Of course, when the temperature plunges below 80 degrees, I swap out those shorts for some pants and that T for a sweatshirt. Living in the desert tends to make one a wimp in the cold.) The point is that I am not a frilly kind of girl.

However, several decades back, when I plied my trade in front of a TV camera as a sportscaster, it did matter what I wore, so much so that I was periodically examined by consultants whose job it was to hate my clothes, hair, makeup, and jewelry, so they could rid me of my bad taste and solidify the need for their opinions on my sartorial choices.

I mention this because, while the idea of dressing up today gives me hives, I do have a clue about what styles look good and which do not. So I will now elaborate on current trends that, well, I just don’t understand.

In my opinion, plaid belongs on kilts not suits.

Take the baggy shirt that has just a small bit tucked in in front. What’s the point there? Why not just wear a shorter shirt, or a button down that’s open in the front, or a jacket, or a good old-fashioned cardigan?

“That’s to give one a sense of curves,” a saleswomen patiently explained when I questioned the look in a dressing room. “You know, to show off one’s waist.”

As someone who has never had much of a waist—I tend to go straight down, a condition my mother pointed out when I was about 14, when she exclaimed, “You’re built just like your father!” A rather confusing remark for an adolescent girl, but I digress.

Tucking in the front of a shirt would never give me a waist, but it did point out yet another strange fashion trend: pants with prominent belt loops but no belt. Everywhere one looks today there are men and women rocking beltless belt loops. Despite my lack of a waist, I used to like belts. Especially western-style, black-and-silver belts, but that accoutrement has vanished. I read belts are making a comeback, but the general public seems not to have caught on yet, leaving me to wonder just how people are holding up their pants.

Ladies, can we at least go for a little more fabric?

And speaking of pants, how is it that “mom” jeans are all the rage. Just a few years back, those navel-hugging pants opened one up to mockery. But now, young women are sashaying about in those high-waisted, straight-legged jeans like they just invented them.

Then there are shorts, which I’ve pilloried before. I almost lost my mind on a hunt for shorts after finding nothing but miniscule ones, often with frayed edges and intentional rips, material that couldn’t possibly cover an average bum, and which women in their fifties and sixties are wearing. (Sorry, ladies, but the visions of you from behind are permanently burned into my retinas.)

This was what hot French guys wore in the 17th century, so I guess I shouldn’t throw stones at today’s sortorial choices.

And women’s fashion aren’t the only ones that have me wondering. What’s with all the men wearing brown shoes with blue suits? Watch any TV news show and just about every guy is combining colors that should not be mixed. And when did plaid suits become all the rage? As an Irish-American girl who grew up in kilts, I feel that is wear plaid belongs. All those tartan suits are giving me a headache.

I could go on, pointing out the ridiculous lengths to which false eyelashes and fingernails have gone, but I guess there have always been strange fashion trends. I’m still trying to wrap my head around those 17th century “hot” guys who favored long flowing powdered wigs, white stockings, knee britches, and funny little shoes. (For some strange reason I’ve tried to envision Jason Mamoa in such attire, but I can’t seem to get it right, and perhaps that’s for the best.)

All that said, fashions will keep changing if for no other reason than designers need to keep selling stuff. So all of you, have at it.

Now, where are my shorts and T-shirt?

Anne Montgomery’s novels can be found wherever books are sold.

Goodreads

Amazon

Should we be pushing beauty products on kids?

The face product industry is promoting products for children, insisting it’s never too early to worry about your looks.

As a person who’s spent a crap load of money on face products over the years—I was a TV sportscaster, so my reasoning was I wanted to keep my job—I should probably not be one to complain. Still, a commercial I watched recently has me riled.

A 50-something, stunning movie star was hawking face cream. Her skin looked flawless and was no doubt the result of good genes and perfect lighting, and, okay, maybe some moisturizer and sunscreen. What really irked me was when the next shot showed a child, a young actor chosen to appear as we might have expected said star to look when she was say 12.

The point, of course, was to let the viewer know that the younger one begins a skin regimen the more likely they are to look beautiful. I thought perhaps I was over reacting until I watched a story on NBC. The piece pointed out that face products are a $90 billion industry annually, and that the makers of said products are now marketing their brands to Generation Alpha, those born from 2010 and beyond.

While I’m not great at math, even I can surmise that those kids are currently 13 and younger, so it appears the makers of face products are doing their best to cash in on children. And boy are they smart. These companies are using internet influencers—called skinfluencers—to convince young girls that they must use expensive face products if they want to be beautiful. And it’s working. According to the TV story, parents all over the country admit that their daughters are not asking for the usual toys and electronics this holiday season. Nope, they have cleansers, toners, moisturizers, and face masks on their Christmas wish lists.

The reporter in the story gathered a half-dozen 11-year-olds, friends of her daughter. Without exception they insisted that of course they wanted these fancy face products. Now I’m not saying children shouldn’t take care of their skin, but a gentle cleanser, moisturizer, and sunscreen should be sufficient and should not break the bank.

The problem is our culture is constantly beating the drum about beauty being the only thing of importance and the pressure this puts on children. Consider the use of online filters. Eighty-seven percent of those between 13 and 21 admit to altering their looks on line, and 20% use filters on every post, all in an effort to look more beautiful. Sadly, this obsession with looks makes the majority of kids feel worse about their actual appearance.

Now I’m not blaming the face product folks for all of this, still their attempt to draw very young children into the beauty fray is disappointing. I can’t help but imagine how nice it would be if we could give children a little more time to just be kids, ones that don’t have to constantly compare their looks to others.

Anne Montgomery’s novels can be found wherever books are sold.

Goodreads

Amazon